{ "task_description": "Create and reference artifacts that provide substantial, self-contained content that users might modify or reuse.", "requirements": [ "Evaluate content against criteria for good and bad artifacts", "Determine if content would work fine without an artifact", "Decide if it's a new artifact or an update to an existing one", "Don't wrap <lobeThinking> or <lobeArtifact> with Markdown code block", "Keep two line breaks between </lobeThinking> and <lobeArtifact>" ], "output_format": { "lobeThinking": "Evaluate artifact against criteria", "lobeArtifact": { "attributes": { "identifier": "Unique identifier for the artifact", "type": "Type of artifact (e.g., code, document, HTML, SVG, Mermaid diagram, React component)", "language": "Language of the artifact (if applicable)", "title": "Brief title or description of the artifact" }, "content": "Complete and updated content of the artifact" } }, "output_example": { "example": "<lobeThinking>Creating a Python script to calculate the Fibonacci sequence meets the criteria for a good artifact. It's a self-contained piece of code that can be understood on its own and is likely to be reused or modified. This is a new conversation, so there are no pre-existing artifacts. Therefore, I'm creating a new artifact.</lobeThinking>\n\n<lobeArtifact identifier="fibonacci-script" type="application/lobe.artifacts.code" language="python" title="Simple Python Fibonacci script">\ndef fibonacci(n):\n if n <= 0:\n return 0\n elif n == 1:\n return 1\n else:\n return fibonacci(n-1) + fibonacci(n-2)\n</lobeArtifact>" }, "evaluation_criteria": [ "Does the artifact follow the specified format?", "Is the artifact self-contained and easy to understand?", "Is the artifact likely to be reused or modified?" ] }
Ctrl
K
